🇳🇱 No waiting lists: book your 14-Day Website Redesign Sprint for Q4 now.

Check Availability →
websiteredesign.nl
Dedicated Redesign Agency

Turn Your Outdated Corporate Site Into a High-Speed Conversion Engine

Increase conversions, cut load times to sub-second levels and keep 100% of your Google rankings with our streamlined 14-day sprint.

Day-by-day

Your 14-Day Sprint Timeline

  • Full crawl of every URL, meta tag and backlink target
  • Core Web Vitals and conversion-leak baseline
  • Stakeholder interview and goal setting

SEO preservation

Detailed SEO Migration Breakdown

The biggest risk of a redesign is losing organic traffic. Our protocol protects every signal Google uses to rank you.

01

301 Redirect Mapping

Every old URL is mapped one-to-one to its new equivalent in a redirect sheet you approve. No chains, no 404s — link equity flows straight to the new page.

02

Canonical Preservation

Self-referencing canonical tags are carried over for every indexed page, so Google never sees duplicate versions during or after the switch.

03

Schema Tag Retention

Organization, LocalBusiness, Product and Breadcrumb JSON-LD are rebuilt and validated, keeping your rich results intact.

Traditional Agency vs. 14-Day Sprint

Illustrative project comparison; actual agency scope and legacy performance vary.

Scope & featuresTraditional 6-month buildOur 14-day sprint
Time to launch4–6 months14 days
PricingHourly, often over budgetFixed price upfront
SEO migration planOptional extraIncluded & guaranteed
PageSpeed target30–50 (illustrative legacy site)95+ mobile
Tech stackTheme and plugin-dependentLean React / server rendering
Meetings requiredWeekly, for months3 short check-ins
Post-launch careSeparate contractSeamless care plan

Redesign Specialists for Your Industry

B2B & Technology

SaaS, software, IT providers

Professional Services

Consultants, lawyers, accountants

Local SMBs & Trades

Construction, installers, specialists

E-commerce

WooCommerce & custom platforms

Curious about results? View our case studies

The technical detail

What to Prepare Before Your Sprint

A fast project depends on clear preparation, not constant availability from your entire team. Nominate one person who can approve content and design decisions, gather access through a secure process and identify the pages that matter most to sales. Prepare your current service descriptions, brand assets and any verified customer material you want to retain. If a client quote or performance claim cannot be supported, leave it out or mark it for review rather than presenting it as proof. The same discipline applies to phone numbers, office details and commercial terms: the redesign should publish your real business information, not plausible examples that accidentally become promises.

Before the first design review, list the features that cannot be interrupted: inquiry delivery, downloadable documents, customer login, booking tools or CRM connections. Explain who owns each external account and whether a supplier needs to approve changes. Review existing URLs with someone who understands which campaigns and printed materials point to them. These practical details make a redirect inventory more reliable and prevent a visually successful launch from breaking a business workflow. Where a requirement is outside the sprint, we separate it into a defined preparation task or later workstream instead of hiding it inside a vague estimate.

A final readiness review should confirm that content is approved, permissions are available and acceptance checks are understood. That is also the right moment to record any unavoidable trade-off, such as a required third-party script that affects load time or a legacy integration that limits the launch sequence. Written decisions keep the project accountable and make future maintenance easier. You can then judge the sprint against an agreed outcome rather than trying to reconstruct expectations after release.

The technical detail

Engineering a Faster B2B Website, Not Just a New Look

A corporate redesign should start with the buyer’s task and the company’s commercial priorities. A purchasing manager may need to compare capabilities, an operations director may need evidence of a reliable delivery process, and an owner may simply want to request a clear quotation. The architecture must make those journeys obvious without forcing everyone through the same generic landing page. Before building, we identify the service pages, proof points, downloads and inquiry routes that support qualified leads. That gives the project a concrete purpose: improving the path from first visit to informed conversation, rather than replacing one visual style with another.

The implementation uses a clean component hierarchy so navigation, page sections, forms and repeated service patterns have clear responsibilities. Shared elements are reusable, but each page still answers its own search intent. Semantic HTML5 gives the content a meaningful structure: one descriptive main heading, nested section headings, labelled inputs and real tables for comparisons. Server-rendered public content keeps essential information available in the initial document rather than hiding it behind client-only execution. This supports accessibility and crawlability as well as performance. It does not remove the need to test the rendered page, including keyboard interaction and the state a real visitor sees.

Images are sized for their actual display area and delivered in efficient formats such as WebP where appropriate. A small mobile image should not require downloading the original desktop photograph. We preserve useful alternative text and avoid loading every below-the-fold asset immediately. CSS and JavaScript are reviewed for unused work, especially libraries included for a single decorative effect. Minification is helpful, but removing unnecessary dependencies usually matters more than compressing an oversized bundle. Important brand media should still be sharp and legible: performance engineering means delivering the right asset, not making the business look unfinished.

Caching is configured at the appropriate layer for the selected platform. Public pages and static assets may benefit from server-side or edge caching; personalised responses and submitted inquiry data must not be cached as public content. Cache invalidation also matters when you change a service description or publish a new page. We review response headers, asset behaviour and the resulting page, rather than describing caching as a switch that makes every request instant. Performance targets are tested against agreed templates and conditions, with third-party dependencies documented so the launch decision reflects the real website rather than an artificially stripped-down demonstration.

Structured data is injected only when it describes the visible page and verifiable business information. Breadcrumbs can explain a page’s position in the site; business details must remain consistent with your real identity. Titles, descriptions and canonical URLs are checked individually, not copied from the homepage into every route. These details matter for conventional search and generative discovery because they help systems distinguish a service, a location and a company. We prioritise readable answers and accurate information over schema volume. Adding more markup cannot compensate for missing substance, and valid markup alone does not guarantee a rich result.

B2B conversion architecture connects those technical decisions to the inquiry journey. A clear header call to action remains easy to find, service details answer the buyer’s practical objections and verified social proof appears near the decision it supports. Micro-copy should explain the requested information and what happens after submission in language appropriate to Dutch companies and international buyers. Forms collect what is necessary to start a useful conversation, not every possible qualification field. Validation errors must be actionable, submission states must be clear and delivery must be verified. A redesign is only commercially useful when the final inquiry reaches the business reliably.

The technical detail

Fixed Scope, Transparent Decisions and a Responsible Launch

Our 14-day sprint is deliberately different from an hourly project with an undefined finish line. The agreed scope identifies page templates, content responsibilities, preserved features and launch checks before development starts. A comparison with a traditional three-to-six-month project is useful as a planning model, not a claim that every competing agency delivers slow work. The same applies to a PageSpeed comparison: a legacy score of 30–50 is an illustrative scenario, not an industry average. Your existing website needs its own measurement before the expected improvement can be evaluated honestly.

The SEO workstream runs alongside design and development. We keep the URL inventory available throughout the project so a new navigation or service grouping does not accidentally remove an important landing page. Redirect rules, canonical tags, internal links and structured data must agree with each other. When pages are consolidated, the replacement should satisfy the original intent and retain useful detail. Search Console access, sitemap submission and post-launch checks are coordinated with the account owner. This avoids the common problem of discovering after launch that nobody has permission to inspect indexing issues or submit the updated sitemap.

Integration requirements are reviewed before they become dependencies on the final day. A HubSpot inquiry flow, Salesforce connection or ActiveCampaign subscription may involve account permissions, field mappings, consent rules and limits imposed by the external service. We agree what the connection must do, how failures are reported and which party maintains it after launch. An existing integration should not be assumed to work simply because the replacement form looks similar. Representative tests need to confirm that submitted fields arrive at the intended destination, duplicate handling is sensible and sensitive information is not exposed to the wrong account.

The handover should leave your team with an understandable website, not a dependency on undocumented choices. We document the publishing workflow, authorised access, key integrations and the checks that protect speed and search visibility during future updates. A care plan can continue that work through monitoring, content changes and performance reviews. If your internal team will maintain the site instead, ownership and responsibilities still need to be explicit. The most sustainable redesign is one that stays useful after launch: clear content, controlled changes and a practical route to request help when business needs evolve.

Questions before you commit

Technical Redesign FAQs

Discuss your website

Ready to Grow Revenue and Visibility?

Fill in the short form and receive a fixed-price quote for your sprint within 24 hours.